DE EN ES FR IT TR

Digital Deposits: Function, Risks, and Regulatory Classification

18.06.2025

1. Between DeFi Innovation and Regulatory Compliance

The debate surrounding digital money is often polarized: on the one side are Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) as a sovereign solution, and on the other, private-sector stablecoins like USDC or Tether.

In this field of tension, a third category is establishing itself: Crypto Deposit Tokens (CDTs). These involve the tokenization of demand deposits by regulated commercial banks. What initially seems like a technical niche solution has the potential to become a significant pillar of the digital financial infrastructure – as a connecting element between the efficiency of blockchain technology and the security of the regulated banking sector.

2. Definition and Functioning

Crypto Deposit Tokens are digital representations of bank deposits on a blockchain. Technically and legally, they differ fundamentally from classic stablecoins:

While stablecoins are often backed by a portfolio of liquid assets (e.g., government bonds) held by a trustee, a CDT is a direct liability of the issuing bank to the customer. It is tokenized commercial bank money.

The implications of this difference are far-reaching:

  • Legal Certainty: CDTs are subject to banking regulation and impact the balance sheet.
  • Deposit Protection: In many jurisdictions, CDTs could fall under existing deposit insurance schemes (subject to individual legal review).
  • Settlement: Settlement occurs finally in the bank's books, minimizing counterparty risk against unregulated intermediaries.

3. Strategic Relevance for the Financial System

Global financial institutions such as JP Morgan (JPM Coin) or consortia in Singapore and Switzerland are driving the development of CDTs. The driver is not speculation, but the need for efficient transaction processing in an institutional context.

Tokenized assets (securities) require a corresponding means of payment for settlement ("Cash Leg"). CDTs fill this gap by providing a blockchain-native payment method that enables "Atomic Settlement" (delivery-vs-payment) without leaving the ecosystem of the regulated financial industry.

This reduces counterparty risk in interbank trading and increases liquidity efficiency in the treasury management of global corporations.

4. Risk Analysis of Tokenized Deposits

Despite the advantages, Crypto Deposit Tokens bring specific risks that must be viewed with nuance.

Counterparty Risk
A CDT is not central bank money, but a claim on a private bank. In the event of bank insolvency, the token is affected just as much as a classic demand deposit. Users must therefore check the creditworthiness of the issuer.

Liquidity Fragmentation
If every bank issues its own proprietary tokens, a fragmented market emerges. Without interoperability standards, "walled gardens" threaten to arise, where liquidity remains isolated and cannot flow freely between different bank networks.

Programmable Control
CDTs enable features like "allowlisting" or "blacklisting" at the smart contract level. What is necessary from a compliance perspective (KYC/AML) means a restriction of free availability for the user compared to permissionless systems.

5. System Comparison: CBDCs vs. Stablecoins vs. CDTs

A classification of the three main forms of digital money clarifies the positioning of CDTs:

  1. CBDCs (Central Bank Money):

    • Advantage: Highest security (no default risk).
    • Disadvantage: Privacy concerns, slow implementation, politically complex.

  2. Stablecoins (Non-Bank Money):

    • Advantage: High interoperability, globally available, DeFi-compatible.
    • Disadvantage: Issuer risk, regulatory uncertainties, often non-transparent backing.

  3. Crypto Deposit Tokens (Commercial Bank Money):

    • Advantage: Regulated, integratable into existing bank processes, programmable.
    • Disadvantage: Dependence on banking infrastructure, fragmentation risk, limited privacy.

CDTs are thus the evolutionary step of the existing banking system into the digital era – conservative, but compatible.

6. Use Cases in Institutional Practice

The primary benefit of CDTs currently lies in the B2B and institutional sector:

  • Delivery-vs-Payment (DvP): Risk-free settlement of securities purchases on the blockchain without clearing houses.
  • Automated Corporate Treasuries: Programmable liquidity management for multinational corporations (e.g., automatic cash pooling overnight).
  • FX Settlement: Reduction of settlement times in foreign exchange trading from days (T+2) to seconds (T+0).

For the DeFi sector, CDTs could serve as a bridge to channel institutional capital into protocols that must meet strict compliance requirements (KYC) ("Permissioned DeFi").

7. Conclusion: Infrastructure Instead of Disruption

Crypto Deposit Tokens do not represent a revolution in the monetary system, but a technological modernization of banking systems. They resolve efficiency problems in settlement and offer legal certainty for tokenized assets.

For users, however, this also means: The known dependencies on the banking sector remain. CDTs offer the efficiency of blockchain, but embedded in the control mechanisms of the traditional financial market. Those looking for decentralization will not find it here. However, those requiring scalable, regulated payment solutions for the digital economy will find CDTs an essential building block of the future financial architecture.

FAQ

Usage in open DeFi protocols is currently severely restricted. Since CDTs are subject to regulatory requirements (KYC/AML), they are usually technically (whitelisting) or legally incompatible with permissionless protocols. Their area of application lies primarily in "Permissioned DeFi" or closed bank networks.

Stablecoins are typically backed by a pool of reserve assets held by a trustee. CDTs, on the other hand, are balance sheet liabilities of the issuing bank. They are "backed" by the bank's general balance sheet and equity, similar to a demand deposit in a checking account.

Yes. Since it is a claim on a commercial bank, holders bear the credit risk of that bank. In the event of insolvency, the corresponding national resolution regimes apply. Whether deposit insurance schemes apply depends on the specific legal structure and jurisdiction.

No. CDTs require user identification (KYC). While the transaction history is technically recorded on the blockchain, identities are known to the bank and accessible to regulators. They offer no anonymity protection like cash.

Banks prefer CDTs because they ensure full control over compliance, incur no dependence on third-party issuers (such as Circle or Tether), and can hold the issued money on their own balance sheet, which is advantageous for liquidity management.

Fragmentation means that tokens from Bank A might not be readily accepted in Bank B's network. Unlike a universal stablecoin, this could lead to incompatible liquidity pools that must first be connected through complex interoperability solutions.

Blog